Skip to content
Resources · Proof

Analyst coverage

What independent research says about SafePaaS.

Independent research that examines how SafePaaS performs in customer environments, free to download.

Reports

Independent research on SafePaaS.

GRC 20/20 · October 2026

SafePaaS: From Fragmented Access Controls to Federated Governance

Independent research firm GRC 20/20 examines SafePaaS through application-level analysis and customer reference interviews, including a distributor reporting approximately 60% less time spent on its segregation of duties process. See how organizations are reducing access-review effort, identifying segregation of duties conflicts, and connecting governance decisions to verified action.

Your identity tools show who has access. Can you prove that access is appropriate? A user can have an approved account and still hold permissions that create a financial or operational risk. A manager can reject access during a review while that access remains active.

The report offers three insights to inform your next governance decision:

  • Find meaningful access conflicts without spending more time investigating noise.
  • Connect access reviews to removal, accountability, and audit evidence.
  • Extend governance across existing systems and understand what successful implementation requires.
Access the free report
Independent analysis

Why analyst research matters.

✓GRC 20/20 is an independent research firm specializing in governance, risk management, and compliance. Its founder, Michael Rasmussen, is known as The GRC Pundit & Analyst and is renowned as the “Father of GRC” for first defining and modelling the GRC market in February 2002 while at Forrester.
✓The GRC 20/20 report combines analyst assessment, product research, and customer reference conversations. It examines SafePaaS’s strengths alongside practical limitations and implementation considerations, giving your team a balanced basis for evaluation.
GRC 20/20 · October 2026

Make your next access-governance decision with customer evidence.

Where could your team reduce manual effort? Which access risks need deeper analysis? What must happen after a reviewer says “remove”? Download the report to examine customer experiences and the questions to ask before your next review cycle, expansion, or investment.